Now, let's discuss blogs that are fit for public perusal.
I had a friend once who would publish every thought broiling in her head. A lot of them were epiphanies that were highly inspiring that led to more intellectually stimulating runoffs and further conversations and or blogs. But some of them were pure whining and I felt, beneath her. They improve no one and they reflect an uncomplimentary side of her to public perusal.
Of course she did not agree with me. A blog is either whining or boastful.
If I look back at some of my blogs with a critical eye, they all seem very boastful to me. Although at the time they were written and published, I thought I was just sharing some interesting insights.
But then again, any event or insight could be reported with a negative or positive slant. We could either whine over something or boast about it. We could choose to empower our readers with our experience; we could choose to entertain our readers by writing wittily about our mishaps or we could invite our readers to spiral down the woe-is-me-the-world-is-mean path.
Sadly, in the case of my friend, the blogs that garnered the most response are the woebegone ones. They are chockful with responses of pseudo-concern while her most inspirational blogs have only one or two, or worse, no response at all.
Human nature has such a formidable arsenal of vocabulary when commiserating over a misfortune or negative event. And are woefully tongue-tied in the face of an inspiring and positive event.
Bad news sell way better than good.
No comments:
Post a Comment